CARVERSAL

G Motors' parent company JSW MG Motors India launched their much awaited all electric car last year, the Windsor. Most attention seems to be garnered by this car for its roomy interiors and attractive introductory offer whereby customers who picked up delivery before December 2024 would enjoy "Free 1-year unlimited charging." This particular promise is viewed as ground-breaking and invigorating for many customers to actually convert to electric mobility. 

Let us look further into the details concerning this controversy and find out whether this new car scheme has actually cheated consumers, courtesy MG Motors. 

MG's Free Charging Promise: What Went Wrong?

A selling point of the Windsor was an offer of 1 year unlimited free charging from the day of purchase of the electric car. A lot of people went very near the verge of buying the new Windsor EV when talks were spread around about running their electric car at the lowest operating cost with this announcement. With policy modification, however, that "unlimited" offer was changed. 

What Has Changed?

• MG Motors has now placed a cap of 1,000 kWh (units) on free charging, valid for a year from the delivery date.

• After using up these 1,000 units, customers will have to pay for further charging.

• Those unaware of this policy change may assume they still have unlimited access to free charging when, in reality, their consumption is restricted.

Therefore, an average Windsor user will probably drive around 7,200 to 7,500 km of "free" driving in a year. This presumes that the Windsor consumes about 38 units of electricity for one full charge. This amounts to 26 free charges in a year under this "free charging" constraint. 

Compare this with the Battery-as-a-Service Model MG rolled out to allow every user to run a minimum of 1500km a month (18,000km a year). The inconsistency is glaring—while this company expects the customer to be driving 18,000 km a year, this 'free charging' scheme covers the customer for just 7,500 km, throwing back expenses on the customer. 

Also Read: Unleash the Power of Mahindra's BE 6 in BGMI - A Game Changer!

MG Windsor: A Cleverly Disguised Marketing Strategy?

Many automotive experts and customers believe that MG Motors used this ‘free unlimited charging’ scheme as a bait-and-switch marketing tactic. The move appears calculated, likely to boost initial sales and create a buzz around the Windsor EV.

Once MG achieved its sales targets, it revised the charging policy, restricting customers from enjoying what they were originally promised. This sudden shift raises important ethical concerns about misleading marketing in the EV industry.

Customer Backlash: Growing Discontent Among Windsor Buyers

Many Windsor owners feel cheated by MG’s unexpected policy change, with several expressing frustration on social media and online forums. Key concerns include:

• Misleading advertising – Customers believed they were getting unlimited charging for one year, but the new cap significantly reduces its value.

• Unfair cost burden – With the new 1,000-unit limit, Windsor owners will now have to pay for extra charging, despite being led to believe otherwise.

• Lack of transparency – MG quietly revised the terms without proper communication, leaving many customers unaware of the change.

Given these concerns, several Windsor owners are now demanding explanations from MG Motors, with some even considering legal action for false advertising.

Why Did MG Motors Change the Offer?

The Windsor EV was a runaway success, quickly outselling other EVs, including the Tata Nexon EV. However, this unexpectedly high demand may have caused MG to rethink its free charging offer, leading to:

1. Higher-than-expected costs – The company may have realized that providing truly unlimited free charging was financially unsustainable.

2. Profit maximization – With Windsor now an established product, MG might have cut costs by limiting free benefits and increasing paid charging revenue.

3. Market trends and competition – With new EVs launching, MG may have decided to withdraw lucrative offers to keep pricing competitive.

Not only does MG enjoy good reasons, but such opaqueness and abrupt changes tarnish its reputation and casts doubt on its commitment to customer satisfaction. 

Will This Impact MG’s Future in India?

MG has severely dented its credibility, and the controversy may dampen future sales and brand acceptability. Some concerns are: 

• Decline in customer trust – Many buyers now doubt MG’s promises, making them hesitant to invest in its future products.

• Reduced brand loyalty – The unhappy customers may prefer to move to competitors like Tata Motors or Hyundai who adopt a more transparent attitude.

• Legal action – If customers pursue legal complaints, MG could face penalties for misleading advertising.

To regain customer trust, MG Motors must address this issue transparently, possibly by:

• Revising its charging cap to be more consumer-friendly.

• Offering compensation to affected customers.

• Maintaining transparency in any future advertisements. 

Conclusion

While MG Motors technically did not break any laws, its bait-and-switch strategy can be considered misleading and unethical. Many buyers of the Windsor bought it, thinking they would receive free unlimited charging, only with the realization coming late that it was actually a limited offer. 

In a civilised country like India, as the EV sector blossoms, transparency and fairness will have to take precedence over short-lived profit; if MG wishes to become the leader in the Indian EV sector, it better begin pacifying customers' grievances over unfulfilled promises.

Check Out: